Keywan Abbasi (the Baha’i director of Manoto network) has find communicative ways with the influential members of these two wealthy communities in London due to his attachment to Baha’ism and his wife’s (called Marjan Eskandari the offspring of Farhad Eskandari, the Iranian Jewish resided in the occupied lands) one with the Jewish community. He also could prepare money from the Baha’is and the Jewish people for the so-called entertainment political project.

     The successful process of the functions of programmers and idea developers of Manoto network and attracting many addressees attracted many governmental and private investors in London.

So, the manager of the network formed the intelligent security chains of England, America, the Zionistic regime and Baha’ism accepting 55 million dollar suggestion of Robert Mouqer Baluoozi the offspring of Hassan Mouqer Baluoozi[1]. Thus, being the member of the Colonial cult of Baha’ism is considered as a special previlage for being employed in the network.

     Consequently, during Day, 1396 riots in Tehran city and several other cities, we observed some changes in dividing tasks in anti-Revolution media related to aliens from the point of view of proselytizing-media transformations. In 1388 sedition, the Persian BBC network was the center of directing riot of media campaign; but in Day, 1396 it was changed from the BBC Farsi to Manoto Baha’i one. This change is completely in the direction of huge scenario of soft war and overthrowing from political into economic sedition, too.[2]

     However, how can a Baha’i person call him/herself as Baha’i while and try to overthrow the political system of the government of a country; while the forged prophet of the cult has forbidden each kind of opposition against the rulers:

"لیس لاحدٍ ان یَعترضَ علی الذین یحکمون علی العباد. دعوالهم ما عندهم و توجّهوا الی القلوب"[3]

     “Nobody is allowed to oppose against those who rule. Leave them alone and pay attention to hearts.”

     How is it possible to consider the condition of bei9ng Baha’is as necessary for being employed in the network whose destructive activities are politically against the Islamic Republic of Iran is obvious for everybody. Abdul Baha has said: “A person who wants to meddle with the political affairs in his/her house or other assemblies or negotiate, it will be better for him/her to cut with the faith, first and second, he/she should know not to belong to the faith, at all.[4]”

     The Baha’is may differentiate between their political obstructionism and liberalism and justify to have right to have freedom to confront against the cruel government of Iran (according to their claim). Do Baha’is have right to have freedom?! Except Abdul Baha has ordered them to be sheep for the cruel: “If a cruel person tyrannized and attacked, it would be the divine disciples’ duty to surrender like sheep and not to resist; but they should revenge swords with nectar and milk. If they are injured, they should kiss the murderers hands and sacrifice in the divine path.[5]”

   Nevertheless, as if the Baha’is themselves know that their leaders had been the Colonialists and traitors’ means contrary to their slogans such as not meddling with policy and considering being treacherous against hometown as sin. Such slogans are covering the undercover activities of the Baha’ism organization.