We asked a proselytizer about his point of view concerning the promised day of judgment by the divine religions. He answered: our leader Bahaullah has presented an interpretation contrary to your assumption about the day of judgment and has interpreted it as the emergence of new religions.[1]

     We said: We suppose that your claim is right. Unless your forged prophet has promised hell fire for his opponents:

"تالله لن یقبل الیوم من احدٍ شیء الّا بعد حُبّه و کفی الله بذلک لشهید و خبیر..."

     “I swear by God, today nothing is being accepted except after being kind with him (that is Bahaullah) and God is enough for this issue as witness. If a person worships God from eternity without beginning to eternity without end; but there isn’t any kindness with this slave (that is Bahaullah), he/she won’t be accepted; but angels will beat his/her deeds on his/her head until he/she will made return to his/her position in the lowest part of the hell.[2]”

     The Baha’i proselytizer continued: Well, he means contrary to your thought, undoubtedly. However, he has likened not believing in himself as the worst possible thing; that is hell in your thoughts.

     Our question continued. How can you interpret your leader’s stipulation (not accepting the opponents’ deeds by God and promising for hell fire for them) as virtual meaning while the forged prophet of Baha’ism has forbidden his statements to be interpreted.[3]

     He answered unwillingly: What’s wrong if we accept his superficial meaning?!

     I continued: It is surprising. In one side, Abdul Baha shouts the slogan of the removal of all prejudices: “We try for this dear aim (removing bigotries)…; but on the other side, other people are just speaking[4].” While, his father considers the disowning as null and merited for fire!

     Aren’t these statements contrary to these two slogans?!