Bahaismiran:

God’s sheep are trying to make a history for itself by forging history and uniforming Baha’ism with the events of the first part of Islam. One of Baha’ism weapon is to pretend to be oppressed among the public including local and ultra-national ones.

Pretending to be oppressed is done by two ways: writing and acting which have been too effective and attractive. Nowadays the acting one is much more important.

However, pretending to be oppressed in Baha’i writings and texts is merely done by forging history unreally.

As an evidence, a subject matter has been written is one of old books of the cult called the sources of the history of Baha’i creed. The author of the book, the Excellency Hesam Naqbaee has written the book 38 years ago aiming collecting the historical resources of Baha’ism. The book includes the resource introduction in the public history of Baha’i faith, the local histories, the memories, accounts and biographies.

In some parts of the book, the history of Neyriz have been mentioned and investigated. In the last line of the page 56 of the book, the author has unwillingly mentioned some crimes and organized assassinations by Baha’ism. He has also narrated the story of Zeinul Abedin Khan’s assassination. He was the then ruler of Neyriz.

Trying to show the rough and unreal face of Zeynul Abedin Khan, the author has tried to purify Baha’ism hidious action and to liken the events of Neyriz, Fars, with Jamal was in the first part of Islam.

In some parts of the book, the Babis’ sedition and killing many people in Neyriz, Fars, have be likened to Jabal was (taken by Jamal was). The event of ending Neyriz fighting has been expanded; so that, the events of Ashura are being associated in the readers’ minds clearly. Of course, this is the author’s art in brainwashing the addressees.

Now some questions:

The author has mentioned five source for his subject matter. Each book has been written by Babi writers. Why none of non-Baha’i historians has recorded the event if such event is true?

As everybody knows the event of Ashura is a guarantee for the survival of Islam and shame for the Omayyads dynasty in spite of the strangulation of that time in writing and recording the historical facts after 1300 years. How and why aren’t there any historical analogues, sign and logical reason for its occurrence in the Iranian history in the last two centuries?

It is more interesting to be noted that none of those five source has published and all 5 books have been kept in the universal house of justice in Israel. Isn’t this kind of supporting by document considered as an insult to addressees because the book is being kept in a special place famous for forging history?