A)  She has rejected the Baha’ism cult’s relationship with the Zionistic movement ruling the occupied lands.

B)  She has rejected Baha’is supports by the Zionistic government.

C)  She has considered Baha’is reaction with the Israeli crimes in Gaza land the same as their behavior in increasing oppositions against the Pahlavi regime and concluded that many people had, during that period of time, criticized Baha’is due to not taking any stand against the regime.

D)  She has illogically considered Baha’is behavior as the some as Switzerland’s position which was impartial during the world war and concluded that the reason for impartiality. Of course, the author has been going to convey the message that the Baha’i faith development is due to its impartiality.

E)  Ms. Rasti has concluded that we supported that Baha’ism denounced Israel because of the attacks (pointing out the 33-day war, 2006), it would list the names of 25 countries including Iran must be denounced due to their behaviors!!!

F)  Eventually, she has mentioned some of Baha’is developments and inspired the addresses’ minds that all of Baha’is developments are due to its impartialities.

G) At the end of her writing, she has emphasized that the Baha’is are impartial; but not indifferent.

     The answer to the author:

1)   Basically, Baha’is related the Pahlavi regime specially the second Pahlavi. The effective presence of economic and political elements in the second Pahlavi court can’t be justified with not interfering in policy by Baha’is/ can Baha’is reject the presence of Sabet Pasal in economy and Dr. Ayadi and Saniee in the management of the second court? Of course, Can Baha’ism reject the presence of Sabeti who was one of the SAWAK managers playing an active role in oppressing the Muslim and non-Muslim revolutionary combatants? Has Ms. Rasti studied the massacre of Azar, 22, 1357 by a Baha’i military agent called Fahandej in Shiraz city? Can the Baha’ism organization not accept using Baha’ism by the enemies of the Islamic republic of Iran to confront against Iran during four decades after the victory of Islamic revolution? Can the role of Arash (Fereydoun Tawangari), the Baha’i torturer in SAVAK in torturing the Muslim and non-Muslim revolutionary combatants? Ms. Rasti, what is the mentioned-above measures called interference in policy or not?

2)   Ms. Rasti, refer to history and glimpse the Babism and Baha’ism emergence and activity history. Refer to history and study Tabarsi, Zanjan and Neyriz events. The assassination of the Iranian king ordered by Hussein Ali Nouri has been the turning point in using violence of Survive the deviant thought of Baha’ism. Haven’t the adherents of the punishment committee, measures been interfering with policy

3)   Mrs. Rasti, the deviant cult of Baha’ism has been one of the hateful intellectual cults in the Iranian community. The reason should be searched in history. After the Islamic revolution, several Baha’is were captured, sentenced and hanged by the Iranian people. Because, Baha’is who were working in the Pahlavi court had severely tyrannized people.

4)   The universal house of justice has claimed that the followers of Baha’ism have been seven million people after nearly 170 years. Pay attention to just the number of Muslim Shiite people participated in Arbaeen walking movement. The number was between b25 to 30 million people. The west is afraid of the expansion of Islam and supporting the oppressed people by this divine religion. I ask you to investigate the realities by the open eyes.

     Because of not having enough knowledge of a religious community, the west has trapped in the Middle East swamp. If it doesn’t confront logically, it will be sank. Of course, there wouldn’t exist any landlord to save the house.