Now, it should be investigated that this rule is basically logical or not. The proselytizer has apparently forgotten that Babism and Baha’ism movement have seriously disagreed a theological movement. It seems he has forgotten that the Babaism claimants were those who believed Islam has abolished. According to this rule Islam and Shiism must be legitimate. The emergence of Islam thought is Europe and America is a sign of turning against.

     Can you find a country which has turned against Baha’ism except Iran? The Baha’ism thought and leaders have been encouraged in the occupied lands. The Baha’i leaders have behaved against Islam and Shiism as long as they could. They are allowed to build the dawning place of mentioning God wherever they like. They have tyrannized the Iranian people during the Pahlavi regime.

     The Baha’ism movement must answer for its crimes against the Iranian Muslim people.

     The Baha’ism thought and belief is a theological deviation in order to facilitate plundering people’s capitals and it will never be forgiven.

     However, to violate this idea of the made prophet of Baha’is it should be said that: Yes, There have been many prophet claimants who had many opponents.

     As many false prophet claimants arose after the holy prophet’s (P.H.) departure. (such as Moseylemeh, Aswad Al-Anansi, Sajaj, TAlhe ibn Khawilad Asadi, Hareth and etc.) [refer to Anwarul Erfan Fi Tafsirul Quran, Vol. 13, p. 50). Even the Baha’is confess they are false. Consequently, according to this idea, all false claimants of prophet hood must have been right!

Footnote

     Abul Fadhl Dawar Panah, Anwarul Erfan Fi Tafsirul Quran, narrated by the website Hozeh Net, Vol. 13, p. 50