After removing the commandment of his exile by Sobhi Azal and returning among the Babis of Iraq, the forged prophet of Baha’ism wrote several writings to publish them as the divine words aiming not being dependent on his brother and creating a new school. As the Baha’i resources claim: “During the first two years of the Blessed Beauty’s returning form Soleymanieh mountains numerous verses and tablets which were equivalent to whole holy Quran were being sent down round-the-clock. What has been written by his blessed handwriting was incredible.[1]”
However, the problem is that he was justifying that nobody was merited to listen to his melodies and was continually ordering for his so-called spiritual writings to be destroyed. As we read from the author of Hussein Ali Nouri: “Hundreds of thousands of verse and tablets sent down from the heaven and written by the Blessed Beauty (:Hussein Ali Nouri) were poured into Tigris river and vanished according to his order… .[2]”
Which socialist or psychologist confirms that this behavior is logical?! Indeed, how can a divine prophet be treacherous in receiving and transferring inspiration and destroy hundreds of thousands of verses?! This vagueness has made the researchers believe that the writings destroyed by the forged prophet of Baha’ism have been drafts and drills to write the tablets. Consequently, he has poured his practice writings into water and; at last, he has kept the final copy.
Nevertheless, this possibility will be stronger when we know that even these final copies contained too many writing errors that the Baha’is had to edit and revise them. As the epistle of Aqdas question and answer replies the question that: Why Hussein Ali Baha’s tablets copies are different as follows:
“Many tablets were sent down and the first contents were matched. According to his order, the contents were read in the presence of Baha to be checked.[3]” concerning the adventure of the Iqan revision, we read: “other manuscript copies have been observed since 1280 and the subsequent years and there were several differences in the past and current copies.[4]”
However, how can the revised drafts of Hussein Ali Nouri be considered as the divine word?!
[1] Shoqi Effendi, Qarn Badi’a (1853-1892), Bija: The national institute of the faith press, 125 Badi’a, Vol. 2, p. 145.
[2] Ibid, p. 146.
[3] Hussein Ali Nouri, the Aqdas, the electronic copy, The Question and Answer epistle, p. 59.
[4] Asadullah Fadhel Mazandarani, Asrarul Athar, Bija: The national institute of the faith press, 124 Badi’a, Vol. 1, p. 268.