Abdul Baha has likened his father’s teachings as a hopeful light to lighten the dark world; while he has rejected this claim and assumed the teaching of oneness of human world as a common principle among the divine prophets. Anyway, how can the Baha’ism teachings be assumed as innovated; while he ignored his confess about his teachings which are imitated?!
Abdul Baha says: “When the world is surrounded by darkness, the Excellency Bahaullah shone like sunshine from Iran’s horizon… He established new teachings and vitalized the eastern teachings by it.[1]”
So, Abdul Baha has considered one of the innovated teachings of his father as the oneness of the human world: “The second teaching of the Excellency Bahaullah is the oneness of the human world.[2]”
However, it is interesting to be known that Abdul Baha had rejected this claim before: “All of the divine prophets tried for the oneness of human world and served it; because this teaching is the basis of the divine teachings. The Excellency Moses (peace be upon him) served the human oneness. The Excellency Jesus Christ (peace be upon him) established the oneness of human. The Excellency Muhammad (peace be upon him) announced the oneness of human. The Bible, the old Testament and the holy Quran established the human oneness.[3]”
Now, because the forged prophet of the deviant cult of Baha’ism has considered contradictions as impossible in the speeches of the divine manifestation[4]; so, how can Abdul Baha’s contradiction be justified?! How can Hussein Ali Nouri be assumed as prophet and his creed be considered the abolisher of the divine religions and his teaching as innovated while confessing the fact that his teachings are imitated is ignored?!!!
[1] Abbas Effandi, the Sermons, the western Germany: the national publishing house of the faith works in Persian and Arabic languages, 127 Badi’a, Vol. 2, p. 144.
[2] Ibid, p. 145.
[3] Abbas Effendi, the Sermon, the western Germany, the national publishing house of the faith works in the Persian and Arabic languages, 1921, Vol. 1, p. 18-19.
[4] Refer to Hussein Ali Nouri, Badi’a, (answering the judge’s questions), the handwriting copy, p. 126.