Bahaismiran:
The Excellency Abdul Baha has considered educating human beings as one of the reasons of the legitimacy of the divine prophets. Contrary to this claim, the forged prophet of Baha’ism became unable to educate his offspring. They, they cursed arguing about succession! Consequently, according to Baha’ism, the forged prophet of Baha’ism is in lack of legitimacy.
Without glancing at their Baha’i leaders’ biographies, the Baha’i proselytizers mention educating human beings as one of the criteria for the Baha. As he has said: “Of we want to know whether prophets have been teachers or not, we should investigate the truth independently. If they have educate the souls and promote them from the lowest degree of ignorance to the highest one of knowledge, they will be the real prophet.[1]”
On the other hand, if a prophet can’t educate people of Baha’ism who hasn’t been able to educate his offspring (and whose offspring have called each other as beetle, worm, bat, craw, wolf, calf and donkey due to succession[2]) isn’t right.
As if, the proselytizers and leaders of the deviant cult of Baha’ism have forgotten Abdul Baha’s statement: “If they educate souls and promote them from the lowest level of ignorance towards the highest level of knowledge, they will certainly be right[3].”
So, it can be concluded that Abdul Baha himself has been able to educate neither his offspring nor the society.
Now, the Baha’i proselytizers claim that if you consider Abdul Baha’s statement concerning his brother who violated as cursing and being impolite; so the holy Quran has been impolite to consider several people as inferior to animals:
" أُولَئِكَ كَالْأَنْعَامِ بَلْ هُمْ أَضَلُّ أُولَئِكَ هُمُ الْغَافِلُونَ " (اعراف/ 179)
“These are as the cattle nay, but they are worse! These are neglectful.” [Al-Aa’raf/179]
These ignorant and blind proselytizers should be answered: 1) The Baha’i leaders have applied such statements not only for the real people; but also even for some tribes[4]; but in the holy Quran merely some human beings have been considered due to quitting logic and enmity with the right:
" وَلَقَدْ ذَرَأْنَا لِجَهَنَّمَ كَثِيرًا مِنَ الْجِنِّ وَالْإِنْسِ لَهُمْ قُلُوبٌ لَا يَفْقَهُونَ بِهَا وَلَهُمْ أَعْيُنٌ لَا يُبْصِرُونَ بِهَا وَلَهُمْ آذَانٌ لَا يَسْمَعُونَ بِهَا أُولَئِكَ كَالْأَنْعَامِ بَلْ هُمْ أَضَلُّ أُولَئِكَ هُمُ الْغَافِلُونَ" (اعراف/ 179)
“Already have we urged unto hell many of the jinn and humankind, having wherewith they understand not, and having eyes wherewith they see not, and having ears wherewith they hear not. These are as the cattle nay, but they are worse! These are the neglectful.” [Al-Aa’raf/179]
2) According to the Baha’i forged prophet’s order, the Baha’is must avoid aspersion even about their enemies: “None of Baha’is must reprehend others and must consider backbiting as the greatest error in the humane world; because in all Bahaullah’s tablets he believes that backbiting and aspersion are of the evil temptations and destructive for the human foundation.[5]”
Anyway, how can these disputes and cursing in the family be justified?! How did the Baha’i leaders preach the orders which they haven’t obeyed?!
[1] Ishraq Khawari, the heaven message, India, Bina, 1986, p. 203.
[2] Abbas Effendi, Makatib, Al-Elmiyeh publishing house, Egypt, attempted by Farajullah Zakiul Kurdi, 1330 A.H., Vol. 1, pp.442-443 and 271.
[3] Ishraq Khawari, the heaven message, India, Bina, 1986, p. 203.
[4] For more study refer to the article: insulting nations by Baha’ism
[5] Abdul Hamid Ishraq Khawari, the treasury of limitation and commandments, the electronic copy, p. 306.