Clear treachery or deceiving naïve people

Tuesday, 09 June 2020 19:17 Written by  font size decrease font size decrease font size increase font size increase font size

     Bahaismiran:

Seyyed Ali Muhammad Bab has called the 12th Imam of Shiites and addressed him as the promised one who will come and introduced himself as his deputy. In order for their invalidity not to be revealed, the Baha'is meant this issue contrary to outward appearance. However, this issue is so clear that they weren’t successful.

     Yes, at first, Seyyed Bab who had planned couldn’t reject the issue of imam of the Time (P.H.) and occultation at once which have been mentioned and specified in Shiite and Sunni tradition books and of Shiite belief necessities; but it was difficult for him to dare. Nevertheless, when Bab interpreted the materials and disturbed people, he rejected the tone of this issue. His interpretations were too weak and fictitious; for instance, a group of Baha'i authors have shamelessly written that Bab's purpose has been the Excellency Bahaullah.

     In this way, the Excellency Bab has been sent on a mission from one of his followers (from his second or third rates) and has changed his name or the names of his descendants; so he has misled people.

     Also, Seyyed Bab appoints successor and deputy for himself (Sobhi Azal) who is the first0rank enemy of Mirza Baha. Necessarily, he was appointed by Baha himself because Bab claimed in his previous statements that the sent verses are from the waited God's proof.

     In Sayyah article (page 5), Abdul Baha says: In his first book written to interpret Yousof chapter, he has addressed that absent person whom he has been blessed one if those statements is as follows:

یا بقیه الله قد فدیت بکلی لک و رضیت السب...الخ.

 

     In this statement, Abdul Baha has committed a scientific crime:

1)   He hasn’t mentioned any name in his addresses in this book specifying the name and lineage of that absent person.

2)   The absent person whom has been asked for help and blessing has been Mirza Baha; while at that time Mirza Baha has been one of his faith followers.

3)   According to Mirza Baha, he hasn’t possessed any post or guardian and a person who isn’t prophet can't be inspired.

4)   There are hundreds of sentences in this book which can't be coincided with Mirza; such as:

"(و یقول المشرکون من اهل الاکتاب ما کنت علی الامر من عند الامام حجه الله من عند حجه القائم المنتظر)"

     By the word مشرکون he meant the opponents of Bab of Imam of the Time (P.H.) and at that day the name Mirza wasn’t mentioned.

5)   Abdul Baha hasn’t mention the sentence before the mentioned sentence:

"یا سید الاکبر ما انا شی الا و قد اقامتنی قدرتک علی الامر و اما انکلت فی شیءٍ الا علیک"

     Because this sentence specifies the guardianship, proof, power and the influence of the absent person.

6)   In his recent writings, Seyyed Bab says: I am the promised proof and the awaited Imam.

7)   After several years, Seyyed Bab claimed for prophethood and founded new book and religion. At that time, Mirza Baha hadn’t been sent on a mission. (according to themselves)

8)   In many cases, Mirza has specified he has obeyed Seyyed Bab; particularly, he says in his first writings such as Badi'a (235):

فوضت امری الایک و توکلت علیک و انت حسبی و معینی و ناصری و بک اکتفیت عن الخلائق اجمعین و الحمدلک اذانک انت معبودی...الخ"[1]



[1] Bab and Baha's trial and investigation, pp. 37 to 39.

Read 554 times
Rate this item
(0 votes)

Template Settings

Color

For each color, the params below will give default values
Black Blue Brow Green Cyan

Body

Background Color
Text Color
Layout Style
Select menu
Google Font
Body Font-size
Body Font-family