Dividing heritage is in contradiction with livelihood adjustment

Wednesday, 03 March 2021 06:20 Written by  font size decrease font size decrease font size increase font size increase font size

Bahaismiran:

The Baha’i leaders have introduce livelihood adjustment as one of their new teachings. While, contrary to the slogan, the residential house which is considered as the main property of a deceased person is thought to belong to the elder male offspring. Indeed, Baha’ism that can create adjustment in the family system can’t claim for adjusting livelihood in the universal level!

 

A Baha’i proselytizer compares the claim for livelihood adjustment (That is fair distribution of wealth and acquiring the materialistic welfare publicly) by the Baha’i leaders with the unfair commandment of dividing heritage including:

“Our leaders have considered livelihood adjustment as one of their new teachings which deals with human being prosperity; as Abdul Baha has said: “The sixth teaching of the Excellency Bahaullah is adjusting livelihood… The issue of livelihood adjustment is so important and the prosperity for human beings is impossible as long as this issue isn’t fulfilled.[1]

It should be answered to the proselytizer: Your claim resembles a hallow slogan, because the Baha’i leaders have appointed commandment which are contradictory with this slogan in practice!

For instance, the unfair commandment of dividing heritage in Baha’ism in which the forged prophet of Baha’ism has assigned it to the elder male offspring:

 

"و جعلنا الدار المسکونه و البسه المخصوصه للذّریه من الذکران دون الاناث"

“We assigned the residential house and special cloths of the deceased person to the elder male offspring and the female ones aren’t shared[2].”

The Baha’i proselytizers make an excuse that the reason for issuing this commandment is that they don’t want for the deceased person’s capital not to be wasted as Abdul Baha has said: “Wealth will be destroyed if it shares… . However, if it is assigned to elder offspring, it will remain…[3]

 

Baha’ism isn’t able to adjust livelihood in the family system. How can I adjust livelihood in universal level?!

 

 


[1] Abbas Effendi, the Sermons, Germany: the national assembly of publishing the faith works in Persian and Arabic languages, 127 Badi’a, Vol. 2, p. 148.

[2] Hussein Ali Nouri, the Aqdas, the electronic copy, p. 23, paragraph 25.

[3] Fadhel Mazandarani, Amr and Khalq epistle, the electronic copy, Vol. 4, p. 217.

 

Read 424 times
Rate this item
(0 votes)

Template Settings

Color

For each color, the params below will give default values
Black Blue Brow Green Cyan

Body

Background Color
Text Color
Layout Style
Select menu
Google Font
Body Font-size
Body Font-family