In order to present a so-called reason for proving Ali Muhammad Shirazi’s claim for prophethood and the abolition of the religion of Islam by him, the Baha’i proselytizers have considered Islam to be in opposition with the expediencies of time and the new century which is necessary to be abolished. So, Abdul Baha has posed a principle and called it as the necessity for the conformity between religion and the expediencies of time and era and has said.[1]

Also, Ali Muhammad Shirazi abolished the religion of Islam in 19^th century A.D. and appointed 2000 years for the emergence of the next promised one after him in order to confirm its commandments for the next 2000 years.[2]

While just after nearly 13 years, the forged prophet of Baha’ism announced the claim for abolition of Bab’s creed.[3]

He clearly stated in the book Aqdas that he is not only able to abolish Bab’s creed; he is but also able to change each eternal verdict:

"لو یحلٌ ما حرّم فی ازل الازل او بالعکس لیس لاحدٍ ان یتعرض علیه"[4]

On the other hand, according to his claim, Hussein Ali Nouri keep the right for the abolition of the Bayan book after 13 years and the right for changing the eternal commandments for himself.

Questions: How is it logical for God to send a person on a divine mission and to send the divine book and new commandments while even one of his verdict hasn’t been fulfilled; then He sends another one to abolish his religion and commandments? Why did Ali Muhammad Shirazi claim for abolition of the religion of Islam if Ali Muhammad Shirazi’s creed and verdicts weren’t accordance with that time?! Why were Babism immediately abolished by the claimant of Baha’ism prophethood if it wasn’t in conformity with the expediencies of that time?!