They justify that: "Receiving this title has been due to serving the British troops by Abdul Baha. Helping the British troops hasn’t been political; but it was done to help the needy because the Baha'is are serving human being in each part is the world. Baha'is are helping human being free from national, racial, sexual, political and religious attachments. They don’t expect any reward to such an extent that Abdul Baha states: Today, human being is the one who rises to serve all people on the earth."

     However, the Baha'is reasoning isn’t logical and moral because supposing a thief has come into a house to steal the properties of a landlord and he/she needs help to achieve his/her aim, should we help the thief because he/she is a human being?!

     When two people or two countries are fighting, helping one of them due to affection will be enmity against the other. However, why did the Baha'is and Abdul Baha help England instead of the Ottoman?! The Baha'is had expressed their loyalty earlier than the British![2]

     Of course, the Baha'is may make an excuse and say: At that time, the Ottomans were our enemies; but they may forget Baha and Abdul Baha's words who said: "Behave with the tyrant like a loyal person and assume the bloodthirsty  wolves as gazelle.[3]"

     To put my pen down, helping the British Colonial army by Abdul Baha and the Baha'is was tyrannizing the people of the countries invaded by England.