Now, the question is tat: why have the commandments of Baha’ism been profited by the Baha’i leaders?!

The self-proclaimed prophet of Baha’ism has appointed the residential house as the share of inheritance for the male elder offspring in the book Aqdas:

“وَ جَعَلنا الدارَ المَسکُونة و الألبسه المَخصُوصة لِلذُرِّیة مِن الذُکران دُونَ الإناث و الوُراث إنَّهُ لَهُو المُعطی الفَیاض”

“We have appointed the residential house and the dead person’s special cloths for the male offspring …[1]”

While, Abdul Baha has changed the commandment without any reason and has considered the dead person’s residential house belonged to the elder male offspring…[2]”

The Baha’i proselytizer: HE has been the explanatory of Bahaullah’s commandments and he mean the eldest son!

Researcher: Explanation means this is Abdul Baha’s duty to clarity the vagueness of the self-proclaimed Baha’i prophet’s speech. Is limiting the male offspring to the eldest son explanation or deviation?! Should we believe that deviation of this commandment isn’t related to this issue that Abdul Baha has been Bahaullah’s eldest son?!