Bahaismiran:

After mentioning and confirming Bab’s (Ali Muhammad) letter of repentance in Tabriz, Abul Fadhl Golpaygani (one of the Baha’ism proselytizers compared him with the claimant of Baha’ism prophethood. However, although this comparison isn’t true; but as if Goplaygani has forgotten that rejecting all of Bab’s claims means destroying the theological basis; that is destroying all that belong to Baha’ism as the Babism promised one!

Bahaismiran:

Abdul Baha has considered the fulfillment of human education as one of the reasons for the divine prophet legitimacy; while contrary to the claim, the forged prophet of Baha'ism was unable to educate even his offspring! Consequently, according to Baha'ism, the forged prophet of Baha'ism isn’t right!

Bahaismiran:

Contrary to the character sketch of the divine religions in the field of ordering one to do something that’s allowed by religion and dissuading one from doing something that’s forbidden by religion, the Baha’i leaders have opposed this principle and have considered its exercising as merely dons by the administrative foundations. As Ahmad Yazdani writes narrated by the Baha’ism leaders: “the right for opposition, dispute and ordering one to do something that’s allowed by religion and dissuading one from doing something that’s forbidden by religion have been taken away and merely the spiritual assemblies or the universal houses of justice possess the right to govern propel and to be their instructors, advisers and watchful.[1]”

Bahaismiran:

 The book Kashful Qita’ has been written by Abdul Baha’s order to answer the book “Noqtatul Kaff”. However, events like occupying Palestine by the English and falling Czar Russian Emperor cause Abdul Baha to change his capital from czar to London. Consequently, most copies of the book was destroyed by his order because it possessed anti-English nature.